Talk:Australasian snapper
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Australasian snapper appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 July 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Spelling
editIn earlier years, the common name I'd see the most was schnapper, I'm not suure when I first saw 'snapper' - Lu
- According to the NZ Encyclopedia entry listed at the bottom that's a common mispelling. Richard001 22:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Pagrus auratus
editIn 1990, the paper "Pagrus auratus, a new combination for the species known as "snapper" in Australasian waters (Pisces: Sparidae)"[1] was published, and since this article, the Australasian snapper has been only referred to as Pagrus auratus by the scientific community. (Just do a google scholar search on both Chrysophrys auratus and Pagrus auratus - after 1990 the species is referred to as P. auratus, while before 1990 its C. auratus). Why fishbase hasn't caught up yet i don't know, but wikipedia should. I propose the article use P. auratus for the species binomial name. Thoughts? Kare Kare 14:46, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Pagrus
editIt seems that FishBase has relegated Pagrus to a junior synonym of Chrysophrys based on an opinion expressed in Eschmeyer (1998). As far as I am aware, nobody has published any formal taxonomic work to refute Paulin's (1990) use of Pagrus or his synonomy of the New Zealand, Australian and Japanese species (still often referred to as Pagrus major). FishBase's relegation of Pagrus auratus to a homonym therefore has no basis. Genetic work done by Tabata & Taniguchi (2000. Fisheries Science 6(1): 9-18) suggests that the japanese and australasian variants, although almost indistinguishable morphologically, might be treated as subspecies of P. auratus based on some genetic divergence. Either way, everybody who works with these fish accepts Paulin's work and uses Pagrus. Trevfish (talk) 04:17, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
I notice that the Australian museum (http://www.austmus.gov.au/fishes/fishfacts/fish/pauratus.htm) uses pagrus auratus, but places like NCBI's genbank still uses chrysophrys auratus. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.106.118.212 (talk) 03:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
I did notice today Fishbase did change the genus to Pagrus.....Pvmoutside (talk) 12:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Australasian snapper. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121107001620/http://faostat.fao.org/site/629/default.aspx to http://faostat.fao.org/site/629/default.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140313194621/http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/Documents/recreational_fishing/fact_sheets/fact_sheet_pink_snapper.pdf to http://www.fish.wa.gov.au/Documents/recreational_fishing/fact_sheets/fact_sheet_pink_snapper.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160206161154/http://www.charterfishingsydney.com.au:80/snapper/ to http://www.charterfishingsydney.com.au/snapper/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:21, 29 April 2019 (UTC)