Talk:Associated Aviation

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Do we really need a separate article about Associated Aviation Flight 361? edit

The accident is notable, but (for the time being), the story is told in a few sentences. In its current shape, Associated Aviation Flight 361 does not really add anything beyond the information that is already presented here, at the "accidents" section. What are your thoughts and comments?--FoxyOrange (talk) 22:02, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oppose merger - The accident article should contain more information for example when the result of the accident investigation is known it will be detailed on the Flight 361 page but would only appear as a sentence in the brief summary on this page. MilborneOne (talk) 23:20, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply
Oppose merger - I agree; it is too early to say the separate article is superfluous. Carbonix (talk) 11:59, 16 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Suggestion Postpone this discussion until the investigation is complete. We will then be in a better position to make an informed decision as to where the subject matter belongs. 86.5.176.168 (talk) 14:30, 6 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Associated Aviation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 10 July 2017 (UTC)Reply