Talk:Assembly of Dust
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
POV edit
way bias "Though some are familiar with their history, many are not. Assembly of Dust is not a household name but rather a group that might be best described as "Micro celebrities" With a modest but devoted fan base who rally in support of this everyman's collective of working musicians.
"Assembly of Dust is a band that captures nuances of the American experience in story. The represent the Americana aesthetic that was so prominent in 1970's pop music but relatively under-represented commercial music today."
--Seth slackware 03:10, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
That was probably a copyvio. Fixed. Chubbles 22:12, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
I agree that whomever wrote it had a bias tone - i tried to make it more accurate :user ReidGenauer OCt 7 2020
Notability etc edit
That template can probably be removed now. The article could still be improved but it has rudimentary citations and notability now. Instead of whacking on a template I prefer to try to fix the issues. ;-p
I agree this article is sufficiently advanced and equal to most articles of its kind so I’ll remove the template. Robertwhyteus (talk) 21:06, 7 October 2020 (UTC)