Talk:Asiatic Squadron
Latest comment: 11 years ago by Bruce Hall in topic Operational details
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Seems biased edit
this article seems biased. the words "destroy" and "effectively" hint at this bias. while changing these words may remove the impression of bias, this will not actually remove the bias. 61.80.41.26 13:24, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see the bias. Can you explain further? To me "destroy" is a fairly objective term and something that militaries do. Similarly, how is "effectively control" biased? Would "de facto" be better than "effectively"? "Effective" is just a qualifier to mean that they did neither officially or legally controlled, at least in my mind. Certainly if anyone sees bias they should be bold and correct the bias. --Bruce Hall (talk) 02:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Operational details edit
Missing are operational details abou the squadron, such as where it was based and what its strength was. The article would benefit from such information. --Bruce Hall (talk) 02:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)