Talk:Arther Ferrill

Untitled

1600 ghits, but most are term papers citing his books. To find the good ones, it is necessary to check them all. Notable history professor, but a few years before the web. sources supplied, more can be found. DGG 03:41, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Nothing against Ferrill but from my searching I couldn't find anything that lived up to the WP:N "that a topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, reliable published works, whose sources are independent of the subject itself" - all I found were term papers and wikipedia mirror sites. I'm going to nominate this as an AfD to see what other wikipedians think. Madmedea 10:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Misspelled Name should be "Arther" not "Arthur"

AfD and prod were based on wrong spelling (not fault of nominator). But subsequent research with the right spelling is showing notabillit and a broader article is developing. --Kevin Murray 16:08, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Research Leads - Reviews of his works

Research Lead http://www.perseusbooksgroup.com/perseus/book_detail.jsp?isbn=0813333024 cites the following reviews:

• “If you are interested in getting on Ferrill’s roller coaster for a trip covering thousands of years of warfare, you will have a broader perspective and you will find yourself asking questions. Herein lies the value of Origins.” — Military & Naval History Journal
• “An excellent reference.” — San Diego Union
• “A clear, well-organized survey of the stratagem and tactics of early warfare, true to its sources, fascinating in scope.” — Northwest Review of Books

While a bookseller’s quotes of other reviews may not be credible evidence, maybe someone could research these sources. My online search has not found these articles. --Kevin Murray 15:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Two more reviews are claimed by the publisher on the book cover of "fall of Rome":

• Marine Corps Gazette
• History (magazine?)

--Kevin Murray 16:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Another unverified article:

• Review of Arther Ferrill, The Fall of the Roman Empire (The Quarterly Journal of Military History 127/24-5, Andy Grainger), can someone confirm this?

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Arther Ferrill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070110071832/http://depts.washington.edu:80/history/faculty/ferrill.html to http://depts.washington.edu/history/faculty/ferrill.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060821130236/http://victorhanson.com:80/articles/hanson0499v63i2.html to http://www.victorhanson.com/articles/hanson0499v63i2.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070110072736/http://www.utah.edu:80/pat/conference2001/abstracts2001/Loveland.html to http://www.utah.edu/pat/conference2001/abstracts2001/Loveland.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.umd.umich.edu/casl/hum/eng/classes/434/charweb/Fawaz1.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060902123145/https://www.lib.washington.edu/support/fol_newsletter.htm to http://www.lib.washington.edu/support/fol_newsletter.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 18 October 2016 (UTC)