 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Cadwallon and Cadwaladr edit
The articles I linked to in this edit, Cadwallon and Cadwallader, are not the articles on particular historical figures, they are the articles on those two names. I think that's appropriate, in case the reader wants to know more about the name and the various men who bore it.--Cúchullain t/c 19:50, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Well, that seems less unconfusing than using the most famous exemplars, and while I wouldn't do it that way, I kinda like your reasons. Have reverted myself on the article. Best Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 20:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- I figure at the least it's gotta be a reference to someone named Cadwaladr and Cadwallon. Not a big deal, but it spares the interested reader from having to navigate our unfortunate series of dabs for folks by the name of Cadwaladr/Cadwallader/Cadwallader (disambiguation)/Cadwalader.--Cúchullain t/c 20:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's specifically the reason that I liked best. (things sure would be less complicated without all of those <bleeping> readers :) Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 20:58, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
- I figure at the least it's gotta be a reference to someone named Cadwaladr and Cadwallon. Not a big deal, but it spares the interested reader from having to navigate our unfortunate series of dabs for folks by the name of Cadwaladr/Cadwallader/Cadwallader (disambiguation)/Cadwalader.--Cúchullain t/c 20:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
Bibliography edit
moved here, for reinclusion once specific references are included in the main text:
- Davies, John (1990), A History of Wales (First ed.), London: Penguin Group (published 1993), ISBN 0-7139-9098-8
- Lloyd, John Edward (1911), A History of Wales from the Earliest Times to the Edwardian Conquest, vol. I (2nd ed.), London: Longmans, Green, and Co (published 1912)
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
Lists of books without in-line citations are worse than useless. They create the impression the article is well-written and sourced without actually backing that up. — LlywelynII 21:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
- Hello Llywelynll, Didn't look back through your article changes, but I'm probably the guilty party ... I threw this article together quickly, when I needed a reference to it and discovered that it didn't exist. Your improvements are welcome, please continue (and my apologies for any inconvenience that my lack of rigor/accuracy might have caused). Regards, Notuncurious (talk) 22:41, 5 February 2013 (UTC)