Talk:Argus Leader

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

South Dakota Low‑importance

	South Dakota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Dakota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of South Dakota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South DakotaWikipedia:WikiProject South DakotaTemplate:WikiProject South DakotaSouth Dakota articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in South Dakota may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Copyvio edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The entire "History" section appears to be a copyright violation, lifted directly from this article at the Argus Leader's website. I had previously tagged the article with {{copyvio}}, and another editor followed up and zapped the section in question. It has since been reverted to its previous state by an anonymous editor at 204.169.51.241. I will remove the violating section once more, and post a copyvio warning on the user's talk page; I will recommend the article for protection if necessary. -Tobogganoggin ^talk 04:33, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Removed copyvio section a third time, this instance from Barefootpanda. Please add original contributions only! -Tobogganoggin ^talk 18:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic