Talk:Approbation (Catholic canon law)

Catholicism Low‑importance

Approbation (Catholic canon law) is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Disagreement edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@Jonesey95: I disagree with your removal of the secular definitions, as I had added them to secularise the page since the title of the article is very broad. Veverve (talk) 17:01, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please see WP:NOT#DICTIONARY. If you want to create a section, with sources, explaining the significance and context of another meaning of the word, then that would be acceptable. A simple dictionary definition, however, is not. If people want dictionary definitions, that is why we have the wiktionary project, to which there is a link at the bottom of the article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:09, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Jonesey95: You are right. What do you think of the current solution? I have also changed the redirect into a soft Wiktionary redirect. Veverve (talk) 21:52, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic