Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2402:E000:604:CA27:0:0:0:1 in topic WikiProject class rating
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Definition edit

Shouldn't the definiteion of this word also include appreciation in the sense having an appreciation for art, or placing value on an object, person or idea outside of the context of accounting? Does anyone know how to calculate appreciation? If you do could you post teh formula.

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 03:46, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

by x**
I'm 2402:E000:604:CA27:0:0:0:1 (talk) 09:46, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

eh edit

is this different from capital gain? —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk) 16:43, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Propose change to disambiguation page edit

This article currently adds nothing to the financial information available within this encyclopedia; even though capital appreciation has previously been merged into it, there is nothing here worth merging elsewhere. Lots of the incoming links are from subjects unrelated to finance. I propose that it should become a disambiguation page covering upward revaluation of fixed assets, negative Depreciation (currency) i.e. favourable movement in exchange rate, increase in stock valuation or Bond valuation, gratitude, and art criticism. – Fayenatic (talk) 14:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sorry. Today this article was critical to helping to copyedit a PhD. I would like to express my appreciation Logically I can see this is puzzling but until some one has actually written an articlc on another sort of Appreciation, it should stay as it is. Review in two years.--ClemRutter (talk) 15:31, 21 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
Been there, done that with Wikipedia...! But please can you explain what was helpful about this article; in particular, could it not still be found if this was made into a list of the above links with one-line explanations? – Fayenatic (talk) 15:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)Reply