Surprising scarcity of information edit

I'm surprised that this page doesn't even tell when the palace was built. Given that this is such an important building, being featured in a Civ4 expansion and all, I do hope that someone informed on the issue will improve the article. -- D64 (talk) 16:48, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have added Civ4:BTS reference. Stalwart111 (talk) 01:34, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
In fact, when I added the comment above, I think the BTS reference was there - but there was scant other information on this building, which was the inspiration for my sarcasm. I'm happy to see that since my bitching the article has been notably improved. -- D64 (talk) 13:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Much work needed edit

A lot of work is needed for this page, it doesn't even speak about what the palace was used for. This is a very important building, I expected a lot more information. I will try to add more information to this. Hopefully, others will join me. Warrior4321talkContribs 16:56, 30 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Have added more information - hope this helps. Stalwart111 (talk) 01:34, 23 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apostolic Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Apostolic Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:53, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:39, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply