Talk:Anya (Anastasia)/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Aoba47 in topic Disney Princess membership

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pamzeis (talk · contribs) 10:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


I'll pick this one up. Ping me if I don't leave comments within a week. Will try not to screw this up. Pamzeis (talk) 10:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Prose

edit
  • Anya (born Anastasia Nikolaevna) — using "born" just feels very in-universe to me, like you're referring to a real person. Can this be replaced to be less in-universe?
  • Well technically she was a real person lol, but I understand what you mean. I've removed "born Anastasia Nikolaevna" from the body of the paragraph and incorporated it into the footnote about her name instead.--Changedforbetter (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Although I understand that "the youngest daughter of Nicholas II" could be interpreted as an entirely different person on whom Anya was based out of context, I do think that's a bit of reach; this phrase is immediately preceded by "the character is loosely based on two historical figures". I will leave it as-is for now.--Changedforbetter (talk) 18:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • White, the idea that — shouldn't idea be plural?
  • specifically the combination of spunkiness and sweetness she brings to her characters — this is more of an opinion, but it's stated as a fact
  • For mechanical reasons, Ryan recorded most of her dialogue isolated from co-star John Cusack, who voices her character's love interest Dimitri, apart from one occasion on which the actors were allowed to record in neighboring sound booths, which Goldman believes benefited their performances. — there are a lot of ideas jammed into this sentence, making it hard to follow. Can it be split up?
  • hired was unavailable,[28][41] initially only hoping to — Callaway or the other singer?
  • Paris, France to recover — comma after France
  • Anya appears in Anastasia on Ice, an — this kinda comes out of nowhere and feels like it's still talking about Anastasia's plot
  • The first paragraph of #Critical reception mostly consists of "X of Y described Anya as Z", making it kinda boring. If you haven't read it already, WP:CRS is a useful essay for this
  • others can't accept it because she wasn't an — informal contractions
  • Disney' streaming → Disney's streaming or Disney streaming
  • in several merchandise based → in much merchandise based or in a large amount of merchandise based
  • puzzles and CD-Rom games — comma after and

Sources

edit
  • I'm not sure Bustle is the best source for the claim Although Anastasia was in fact murdered alongside her family in 1918 as it has an unclear reliability per RSP. The claim seems quite contentious because of the rumours. Can a better source be found?
  • Originally I wanted a source that specifically compared the animated film to historical events in the context of the source, and this is the best I could find at the time. However, I've replaced the Bustle source about the death confirmation with a source from Encyclopædia Britannica, as well as a footnote elaborating the circumstances surrounding the discovery, with a source from the Los Angeles Times.--Changedforbetter (talk) 20:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • What makes the following sources reliable:
    • Animated Views
Noted website devoted to animation and animated films which, in addition to reviews, regularly publishes content and interviews with artists/creators in the field.--Changedforbetter (talk) 19:38, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • The Portalist
    • PopSugar
    • TheList.com
    • Throwbacks
    • Distractify
  • I think it's suitable for stating an opinion about the "Disney Princess" topic, not too dissimilar from ScreenRant or BuzzFeed.--Changedforbetter (talk) 19:39, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
    • My concerns mostly stem from RSN discussions (see here and here) that deem the source unreliable. But more to the point, the website doesn't seem to be reporting an original opinion, but a "fact" about fans' opinions...
    • DVD Talk

Spot checks all checked out

Other

edit
  • For File:Anya Anastasia.jpeg, the purpose of use is "To show what the character looks like". I don't really find this sufficient. Why does the reader need to know what she looks like?

Article   On hold. Ping me when all have been resolved. Pamzeis (talk) 04:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Second look

edit
  • A former animator for Fox's then-rival studio Disney, critics believe — I think there's a grammatical error here, as the first bit is tied to critics, which means that it's saying the critics were a former animator for Disney
  • working for them Disney — I feel like there's something wrong her, but I can't quite put my finger on it...
  • Bluth and his co-director Gary — missing comma?
  • from actor John Cusack who — unsure but I think there's a missing comma?
  • Anya first appears in the animated film Anastasia (1997). Banished by Nicholas — here we have the inverse of an above comment: it first talks about her first appearance and then in the next sentence, it talks about the plot. And I got a bit confused...
  • praised by critics for making Anya a charming and likableWP:VOICE
  • voice acting for lacking charm — ditto
  • Fox for disrespecting Anastasia — ditto ditto

I think that's it, in addition to a comment about the sourcing above. Pamzeis (talk) 11:54, 6 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pamzeis thank you for your comments. I have once again addressed all concerns. --Changedforbetter (talk) 05:43, 8 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Third look

edit

I think that's everything! A   Pass from me! Pamzeis (talk) 05:40, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Disney Princess membership

edit

Let’s be honest, she deserves it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by KieranCallahan72 (talkcontribs) 20:47, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

She may indeed, but it's not up to us to decide. The Disney Princess navbox does not belong on this page. Powers T 18:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disney needs to add her now! They made merchandise for her so why not? — Preceding unsigned comment added by KieranCallahan72 (talkcontribs) 01:50, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Please do not use an article's talk page as a forum for personal discussions (i.e. WP:NOTFORUM) as discussions in this area should be kept on how to improve the article. Our personal opinions on whether or not Anya should be an official Disney Princess are not relevant to this talk page. Aoba47 (talk) 04:05, 23 December 2022 (UTC)Reply