Talk:Anonymous matching

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Matchmaking vs. dating system edit

Should this system be described as a type of matchmaking? I notice the matchmaking article says:

Matchmaking is any expert-run process of introducing people for the purposes of dating and mating, usually in the context of marriage. Much modern matchmaking tends to substitute information technology or game-like rules for the expert's finesse - thus they are discussed separately under dating system. This article will focus on the role of human matchmakers.

According to eCRUSH[1][2]:

eCRUSH is not a matchmaking service – two people will only be matched if they name each other as a potential love interest on the site. . . eCRUSH® is unlike any other matchmaking or personals site. Instead of blindly matching up strangers, eCRUSH® plays the roll of the note passer.

Does it fall more under the definition of dating system? That article says:

A dating system is any systemic means of improving matchmaking via rules or technology. It is a specialized meeting system where the objective of the meeting, be it live or phone or chat based, is to go on a live date with someone, with usually romantic implications.

24.54.208.177 00:47, 29 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

DoYouDo edit

The DoYouDo article is up for deletion. However, the information contained therein will be preserved indefinitely in the history page of anonymous matching, which you can access by means of this link: [3]. 24.54.208.177 02:51, 29 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Nope. It's gone, guy. Oh well. --Calton | Talk 06:11, 29 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Removed edit

I removed:

I think that the nature of OK Cupid has changed to where it no longer fits in this category of services. Captain Zyrain 14:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Anonymous matching. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:20, 15 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anonymous matching. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply