Talk:Anne Moffat

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Road Wizard in topic Assessment comment

Untitled edit

The sentence 'In 2003/4 (the most recently available figures), she was 635th out of 658 MPs in levels of spending on postage and 642nd in spending on stationery' doesn't make clear whether she was nearly the highest or lowest spenders? 84.9.10.245 19:31, 13 August 2006 (UTC)mdeckerReply

Assessment comment edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Anne Moffat/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
I have rated the =Anne_Moffat&oldid=215494041 version as of 28 May 2008 as Start class. There is some good groundwork here with a reasonable early life section and the presence of an infobox, but as her status as a member of parliament is her primary claim to notability on Wikipedia the Parliamentary career section is very thin. Has she expressed any particular political views in commons debates or in the committees referred to in the article? Can her voting record be expanded? Editors may find the Parliamentary records a useful source of information or alternatively the "They Work For You" link given in the external links section of the article. Additionally, the Expenses section needs to be rewritten as the disjointed sentences are hard to read and a free image would be useful if possible. Finally significant work needs to be done to reference the article as the majority of the article currently seems to be unsourced. Road Wizard (talk) 23:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 23:00, 31 May 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 07:55, 29 April 2016 (UTC)