Talk:Ankle jerk reflex
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ankle jerk reflex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www2.kumc.edu/coa/Education/AMED900/Neurology/NeurologicalExamination.htm - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140609221304/http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis-for/ankle-reflexes-absent/34862-154.html to http://en.diagnosispro.com/differential_diagnosis-for/ankle-reflexes-absent/34862-154.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:16, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Introduction is overly technical edit
I understand this is a common issue with Wikipedia articles on medical topics. People want to be technically accurate and the use of some medical terminology is important. But with that said, the introduction to this article really isn't intelligible to a non-specialist. It uses far too much medical terminology to be understandable to the vast majority of readers and I think it should be simplified by someone with the necessary expertise to do this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:6655:7800:719A:A9C1:E02A:762C (talk) 18:41, 8 January 2018 (UTC)