Talk:Anker Innovations

clarify company name

According to [1] 湖南海翼电子商务股份有限公司由前 is the name of the company, which owns the Anker brand. Google translate reads as Hunan Haoyi E-commerce Co., Ltd..

Is there a guideline for chinese company names? Was it romanized correctly?--Yamavu (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)

Also the name Ocean Wing does popped up during my research too, it might be part of history by now. Maybe they were early sponsors? --Yamavu (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 14:50, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Anker logo.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:40, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Improve product information, product categories and references

The article doesn't capture some of the expanded business operations and product category offerings. For instance soundbars and the line of home security systems and autonomous vacuums from the eufy trademark. It would be good for the article to feel more current with the scope of the brand or its innovations.

There is also a serious need for more third party sources.

--Penguino35 (talk) 19:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC)Penguino35

Awards

Anker was one of five companies to win Top Prize in Good, Cheap and Fast's 2020 Value Awards:

https://www.goodcheapandfast.com/articles/value-award-winners

It's a recognition that, from a statistical perspective, Anker products have above-average ratings and below average prices.

104.162.86.155 (talk) 11:07, 17 December 2020 (UTC)

Possible Article Change (IMPORTANT)

Hello, I feel as that the article should be changed to about Anker Innovations due to the subname being (company) and that Anker is not a company, but a brand under Anker Innovations. WiiBoi (talk) 23:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC)WiiBoi

I think it is important to accurately capture and comprehensively represent as much information as is applicable. It wouldn't hurt to make that distinction and to also update the images/logos to match current.

--Dobblestein (talk) 23:15, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

POV

The controversies section needs to be toned down a bit. It seems like it has an obvious anti-Anker bias. I just don't want Wikipedia to be caught in a product or corporate libel case. ANDROS¹³³⁷_TALK 18:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

The Paul Moore findings need a date and a reference.

I'm not sure the "used to train a facial recognition AI" claim is known/factual.

The whole paragraph is missing mention of the Euphy and Anker responses during the controversy. (except as mentioned in the anti-Anker media coverage) 73.222.78.29 (talk) 18:48, 8 August 2023 (UTC)