Talk:Anglican ministry

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Main article templates etc

edit

It looks a bit weird to me to have a link to a {{main article}} right at the top of the article, doesn't seem to be specifically covered by WP:LEAD. Perhaps would be better as a {{see also}} or {{further}} under "Threefold order"? David Underdown 09:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

High Church interpretation

edit

I am not an expert, but only the high church part of the Church of England calls its' vicars 'priests'. Take a look at the CofE's own website - little or no mention of priesthood. This may be different within the Anglican Church elsewhere. Perhaps someone knowledgeable can correct/add to the article.

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anglican ministry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:04, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply