Talk:Anglican Diocese of Bunbury
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Anglican Diocese of Bunbury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140826113353/http://www.anglicanarchives.org.au/collections/OANDS175.htm to http://www.anglicanarchives.org.au/collections/OANDS175.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061010001311/http://www.bunbury.org.au:80/ to http://www.bunbury.org.au/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Summarise main points in the lead
editThat includes what it is (a diocese), where it is (WA), it's remit (main towns), when it was founded, by whom and who currently leads it. Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Deus et lex: Please explain why you made changes to the lead that are contrary to the format set out above. Laurel Lodged (talk) 11:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- There is no "format" for these pages, they can include any helpful information (and dioceses are so diverse that there shouldn't be a set formula). When you start using terms like "ordinary" and so on (which are not used in Australia), and saying they were "erected" (buildings are erected, not dioceses), then it's clear that sort of formula doesn't work. Please either improve them in a way that is consistent with Australian usage and what actually happens, or leave it alone. Deus et lex (talk) 11:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Deus et lex: In the Anglican Communion, the ecclesial terms "ordinary" and "erected" are quite common. Has the "Anglican Church of Australia" diverged from its roots or just dumbed down? Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- I don't care if they're "quite common" elsewhere, they aren't commonly used, so they don't go in. Deus et lex (talk) 12:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Deus et lex: In the Anglican Communion, the ecclesial terms "ordinary" and "erected" are quite common. Has the "Anglican Church of Australia" diverged from its roots or just dumbed down? Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- There is no "format" for these pages, they can include any helpful information (and dioceses are so diverse that there shouldn't be a set formula). When you start using terms like "ordinary" and so on (which are not used in Australia), and saying they were "erected" (buildings are erected, not dioceses), then it's clear that sort of formula doesn't work. Please either improve them in a way that is consistent with Australian usage and what actually happens, or leave it alone. Deus et lex (talk) 11:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)