Talk:Angela Adams

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

This article appears to be commercial spam edit

This article which was has only one content contributor (an anonymous IP located in Portland, ME) appears to be commercial spam promoting a business in Portland operated on the subject of the article. Centpacrr (talk) 21:54, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please note that I cleaned up the article before I moved it to mainspace. A major contributer having a conflicting interest is not a reason to delete an article. The article is cited by reliable book sources, and after I edited it, the article was written in a neutral point of view. Yes, the article is fairly short and could use work, but it is far from promotional spam. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 21:07, 5 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Angela Adams. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply