New section edit

Hey Apart from Cotton, Amravati is famous for Oranges as well. Then it has Chikhaldara and Semadoh with in district about 50 kms from it. Sachin Gulhane

some problame in AMRAVATI voting edit

for datle co.- Amith Hole 9325287060 or Keshav Yeole 9371912899

Amravati has educational hub of west vidarbha region as well as wel esteem Agricuture products market committee (APMC) which provides platform to sold the agriculture products to the districts farmers.

Sanjay Mahajan 94 22156254 / 0721 - 2571572

Bharatiya Mahavidyalaya edit

Hey the college name should be "Bharatiya Mahavidyalaya" instead of "Bartiya Mahavidyalaya ". Which is a well-known institute for the Arts, Science and Commerce education.

Amravati City Blog edit

Snapshots of Amravati http://amravaticity.blogspot.com/ - Ashish —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashishbijwe24 (talkcontribs) 04:48, 30 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi

In this "Amravati wikipedia" there was information regarding tourism, chikhaldara, melghat etc.(I think somebody has deleted it).I think Melghat,chikhaldara,salbardi are the part of Amravati district which attracts tourist/pilligrims and as torist visits these places which results into growth in revenue of district.Please mention the information regarding it so that whenever people read this wiki they would come to know the importance and place of city in Maharashtra.

Education section needs clean-up. edit

Section Education is written as a advertisement/promotional material.
It needs to be re-written in neutral point of view.
I propose, section Education of this article be expanded as separate article.
Which should include sections for Primary Education, High School, and Higher education.
Suggestions/Contributions/Comments/Queries on Talk:Amravati.
Amshreyas (talk) 08:14, 22 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Removing freedom fighters edit

I am removing freedom fighter's list. It's too long and not directly related to city. May be we may create another article like history of Amravati and add it there. Please revert if you think it is is necessary here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.162.23.77 (talk) 03:45, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Title change edit

Title should be Amaravati,not Amravati. Can someone please change? the pronunciation is also wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:0:B580:831:1F2:7ECC:258A:77AF (talk) 03:49, 25 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Check official website of the district. It is correct.--Vin09(talk) 04:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 12 May 2016 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. Consensus shows that this shouldn't be moved because the spelling without the "a" primarily refers to this article. (non-admin closure) Anarchyte (work | talk) 04:39, 21 May 2016 (UTC)Reply


AmravatiAmravati, Maharashtra – disambiguation of Amaravati Vin09(talk) 04:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  • Mild Oppose per "Amravati is" test, not strongly opposed since adding ",Maharashtra" might help some people on the search results and automatic infill, but if moved then PRIMARYREDIRECT should still go from the current spelling to the city. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. I think the spelling without the A does primarily refer to the city, as indicated by IIO above. And there is no need to include the state name otherwise. This is not part of the WP:USPLACE City, State universe.  — Amakuru (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amravati. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:38, 12 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

infobox edit

Infobox of the page is a mess. I will work on it in my sandbox, and i will update it in mainspace around 18:30, March 16, 2017 UTC. Kindly hold your old horses till then.  usernamekiran (talk) 14:18, 16 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Merger of two pages edit

Commencing. —usernamekiran (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Doneusernamekiran (talk) 01:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


Reasoning for merger

  • Both the pages regarding grounds which were merged in this article, were stub.
  • They were not just stubs, they were not even a big paragraph.
  • As the grounds do not have any other notable history than mentioned, and no bright future in near future, there is no need for them to have separate articles.
  • Based on aforementioned reasoning, the merger was obvious need, so I performed it "boldly". —usernamekiran (talk) 01:29, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Amravati. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Amravati. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:27, 8 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:22, 29 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:07, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply