Talk:Amazing China

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

China: Cinema

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema workgroup.

Undue weight edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I added the template {{undue}} to this article on the basis of the fact that this article only contains those critical anti-China POVs while deliberately ignoring those pro-China POVs, which is nothing but a violation of WP:UNDUE that states Neutrality requires that each article or other page in the mainspace fairly represent all significant viewpoints. --117.136.106.139 (talk) 10:26, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

It seems to me that the majority's view of the film is quite well represented in the article. Seeing as (legal) Mainland news sources are CCP controlled, it would seem odd to me to report them with the same weight as slightly less biased sources (HK and non-China newspapers, for instance). It is quite obvious, I think, that the Party, having produced this film to show how amazing China supposedly is, wouldn't let the media it controls criticise it. I do, therefore, think that all _significant_ viewpoints are represented. If you still disagree, please let us know what we are missing out on.On a sidenote, the POVs you discuss are, I think, not pro-China and anti-China, but either pro-CCP and anti-CCP or, even more correctly, pro-"Amazing China" and anti-"Amazing China". Doanri (talk) 10:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

RfC on 'undue weight' tag edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is undue weight given to negative views/opinions of the film? Doanri (talk) 15:13, 9 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Comment - Summoned by bot. Depends on the weight of the coverage and sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 00:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic