Talk:Alto Velo Claim
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg) | This article was created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's "Latin American and the Caribbean 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out! |
 | A fact from Alto Velo Claim appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
NPOV edit
The language of the article is incredibly biased and violates Wikipedia's NPOV policy. SpencerCS (talk) 04:16, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- So, I'm going to WP:BB; even though I agree that the claim was flimsy (or even beyond flimsy), that word is inherently POV & unencyclopedic. Also, how is this an orphan. It has considerable appropriate linkage for a sub-stub. 75.252.240.194 (talk) 03:37, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Did you know nomination edit
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:25, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that a dispute over bird poop was connected to the impeachment of U.S. President Andrew Johnson? Source: Republic: A Monthly Magazine, Devoted to the Dissemination of Political Information, Volumes 1-4
- ALT1:... that bird poop was at the center of a territorial dispute between the United States and the Dominican Republic throughout the 1860s? Source: Alto Velo Island. Report of the Secretary of State on the Claim of Patterson and Murguiendo with a Further Argument of the Claimants
5x expanded by Tcr25 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- The paragraph "Due to the U.S. Civil War..." is unreferenced. - Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems: - Please bold the article when linked in the hook.
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
Both hooks are good, though ALT1 is perhaps a bit more informative. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, King of Hearts. I think I've addressed both concerns now (graf source and hook bolding). If there are any other issues, please let me know. Thanks! Carter (Tcr25) (talk) 08:30, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
