Talk:Algae fuel in the United States

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sierralandaiche. Peer reviewers: Sierralandaiche.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 13:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

New page edit

The article info is splitfrom algae fuel. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 22:33, 30 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Algae fuel in the United States. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Analysis edit

I have chosen to analyze this page because it has the potential to outline a lot of information regarding the United States' policies regarding algae fuel research and utilization. The small amount of information already posted is correct, the cited sources show reliability and legitimacy, and the table at the bottom of the page links to relevant, well-developed pages. The largest issues with the "Algae Fuel in the United States" page is the lack of detailed information that should be relayed about this topic that is important to the United States' efforts to move away from fossil fuels. My first recommendation is to simply do more research on this topic, add more sections to the page (algae growth methods, government policies, advantages/disadvantages to this fuel source), and fill the page out more thoroughly.

Secondly, the History section only contains information about one program developed by the US to facilitate fossil fuel research - that has since been ended. When I clicked the 'Aquatic Species Program' wikipedia link, I noticed the History paragraph on this page is worded very similarly to the History page on the 'Aquatic Species Program'. Close paraphrasing violates Wikipedia Policy on Plagiarism and Copyright Infringement, so I would recommend re-phrasing that paragraph with a structure unique to this page. This section also needs to be updated to include more recent programs and policy decisions (such as President Obama's Clean Power Plan) that are influencing R & D on algae as a fuel source in the 21st Century.

This article is fairly neutral in presenting facts and not opinions. However, I think the Research section is misleading because it only cites a few examples of American universities researching algae fuel. A fair article should list a larger variety of schools and organizations involved in this area of research. To list only six universities researching algae oil misrepresents the research field as smaller than it really is and excludes large companies with millions of dollars invested in this energy source.

Please contact me if you have any questions or clarifications about my suggestions. -- Sierralandaiche (talk) 01:30, 5 November 2016 (UTC)Reply