Talk:Airside (company)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
Why is there a Wikipedia article on a company which is noted for.... exactly nothing? It's possible that Airside have their own paid insider to protect their page. I know that pornsites do this but......... ho hum. If every single company had their own wikipedia page, there's never be room for anything else! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.21.11.98 (talk) 19:32, 16 December 2007 (UTC)
- Any article about companies should state its significance. The present content fails to do so and it falls now under WP:CSD #11 or better known as WP:SPAM. --Efe (talk) 13:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, well nominations for BAFTAs and being featured by Apple works for me. I'll remove the template. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Airside (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091201091421/http://www.airside.co.uk:80/about to http://www.airside.co.uk/about/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
Speedy Keep Question.
editQuestion on this part as this has been done. I am not sure how to respond or understand. Need Admin help.DGG Light2021 (talk) 16:53, 8 July 2017 (UTC)