Talk:Agriculture in South Africa

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Dodger67 in topic Droughts

Drought on the economy in Eastern cape — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matshika (talkcontribs) 14:18, 29 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Land claims edit

This article should have a section on land claims and its affects (positive and negative) on agriculture in South Africa --NJR_ZA (talk) 08:25, 17 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Primary School invitation edit

Hi everybody. On behalf of the teams behind the Wikipedia Primary School research project, I would like to announce that this article was selected a while ago to be reviewed by an external expert. We'd now like to ask interested editors to join our efforts and improve the article before September 15, 2015 (any timezone) as they see fit; a revision will be then sent to the designated expert for review. Any notes and remarks written by the external expert will be made available on this page under a CC-BY-SA license as soon as possible, so that you can read them, discuss them and then decide if and how to use them. Please sign up here to let us know you're collaborating. Thanks a lot for your support! --Elitre (WPS) (talk) 13:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Agriculture in South Africa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:18, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Review within the Wikipedia Primary School project edit

 

Hi all. As anticipated, some weeks ago Simone Sala agreed to review this article within the scope of the project linked above. You can find his notes in the PDF I just uploaded to Commons. We'd like to thank Simone Sala for his work and for his helpful notes. We invite everybody to feel free to reuse the review to improve the article and/or to comment it here. Best, Anthere (talk) 19:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

To facilitate the editing process, I copied Simone Sala notes below.

Quality of the Summary edit

Is the summary of the article a complete, thorough, and concise introduction to the topic? How do you think the summary could be improved? Which meaningful data are missing? Is there something that you find too much detailed for a general overview of the topic?

Summary is complete.
Could be improved by inserting media (pictures, photos) and more data on agricultural production, trade and marketing.
Some of the data (e.g. those from FAOSTAT) could be updated (existing ones reflect 2008, 2006, 2011 data).
The entry is at an appropriate level of detail for a general overview.

Structure and style of the article edit

Is the article properly presenting the topic for a general public? Does the article provide a complete and easy-to-navigate structure? Which paragraph would you add, unify or split into different parts? Please provide a list of suggestions. Is the article well written and understandable at a high school level?

The article is adequately presenting the topic for a general public.
Structure is complete and easy to navigate.
Paragraph on land tenure, conflict could be added (by splitting the references in the introduction section).
Article is written clearly and understandable at a high school level.

Content edit

Is the article comprehensive of major facts related to the topic? Is the article adequately placing the subject in context? What does it miss? Please provide a list of topics you think should be included in the article (suggestions must be related to bibliography). Do you find that some arguments are not meaningful or representative of the topic for a general public. What should be deleted? Please explain why.

The article may be expanded by including further information on the history of agriculture in South Africa. Furthermore, the following topic may be included:

  • agricultural workforce (smallholders, family farmers)
  • infrastructures (i.e. irrigation, logistics)
  • agroindustry (i.e. trade).

International and local dimension edit

Is the article neutral (it presents general and acknowledged views fairly and without bias)? Is the article representative of the international dimension and consolidated research about the topic? If applicable, does the article feature examples from all over the world (no localisms)? Please draft a list of what is missing with related references.

The article is mostly neutral, though the section on land conflicts would need to be expanded and updated to be considered fully neutral. The topic describes a local context, and as such has no reason to include examples from all over the world.

References (essential to allow the articles to be improved) edit

Is the list of publications comprehensive and updated? Does it list the fundamental monographs and papers? Please provide primary/generic and secondary/original resources which need to be included and suggest the list of publications which should be removed.

Further references from UN FAO, IFAD, Government of South Africa, OECD could be included.
The section on land conflicts would need a separate section (not in the introduction) and further references [4; 10] from academic papers instead of grey literature (i.e. newspapers) are advised.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Agriculture in South Africa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:12, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Agriculture in South Africa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Droughts edit

Impact of droughts in South Africa 41.114.205.18 (talk) 07:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

What about it? Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:12, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply