Talk:Aerodynamic Forms in Space

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kavyansh.Singh in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 07:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • ... that one reporter described Aerodynamic Forms in Space as "a model airplane sent through a malfunctioning transporter from Star Trek"? Source: "Graham has created a sculpture that resembles a model airplane sent through a malfunctioning transporter from Star Trek." [1]

5x expanded by Z1720 (talk). Self-nominated at 02:07, 2 August 2022 (UTC).Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.

Overall:   @Z1720: Nice job! No issues with ALT0, which is the one I prefer. (Though should Star Trek be italicized?) For ALT1, the hook says "misassembled" while the article says "reassembled". Those convey slightly different things to me – I can see how either could work based on the source, but I would suggest making the hook and article consistent. DanCherek (talk) 15:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • @DanCherek: I have italicized Star Trek. I changed reassembled as the sources mention him putting the gliders together incorrectly, but not disassembling them first; misassembled is probably more accurate. Z1720 (talk) 15:29, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
    •   Looks ready to me! Both hooks are good to go. Thanks, DanCherek (talk) 15:38, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply