Talk:Adnan al-Malki

SSNP abuse and unjust Trial

Within seconds of assassinating Colonel Adnan AL Maki, during a soccer game, immediately some conspirators announced that SSNP has killed the colonel. The calling has also rise in the media and in every city before any trial or any confirmed facts. The call was also based on saying soldier Younis Abdel Rahim who is SSNP member killed the colonel and then killed himself upon personal revenge to his sister's story with the colonel.------------ First :In the Trial the SSNP lawyer asked a question based on autopsy : The bullet that killed Colonel Adnan AL Malki is different in sized from the one killed Younes. So if you saying that Younes killed the Colonel , then you need to tell us who killed Mr Younis. The question remain an answered and the real criminal who killed both ,in conclusion of pre arranged propaganda, remain free. Second: If the story was correct that Younes truly killed and was revenging to his sister from the colonel , then why shall the SSNP be responsible. Third: Even though the west is accused of orchestrating this whole crime in the struggle over gaining interest in Syria, the SSNP accusation to be pro west remain part of the propaganda to destroy the SSNP as a secular party,, as people were newly freed from western occupation to their contry and accusing SSNP to be pro west was equal to treason.Conspiracy proved to exist by ending all secular movements later within few years SSNP was established 1932, and was anti sectarian party, which was not liked by some who wanted to show Syria as a primitive religious society with no respect to secularism . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Syrian10 (talk • contribs) 20:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage.) Prior content in this article duplicated the Historical Dictionary of Syria, 2nd edition. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 14:07, 1 September 2014 (UTC)