Talk:Ademar José Gevaerd

This article was nominated for deletion on 24 December 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Brazil Low‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reliability of sources edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There are a lot of very unreliable sources in this article, that even a non-Portuguese speaker can recognise. PRWeb, a self-published (on an Australian ISP user's webpage) journal, etc, etc. I would suggest that anybody assessing this article take a good hard look at each source, use Google Translate if necessary, and decide for themselves if they're reliable. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 18:18, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Unreliable source, possible intent to demean edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The reference #14 is unreliable and the entire paragraph that preceded it was clearly an attempt to demean the biographee, and was removed (paragraph and reference only). The biographee (Gevaerd) has been alerted about that and it is suspected that this bit was added by the person who owns the "source" that is mentioned in reference #14 (pepe chaves). The facts had been reversed: Gevaerd does not even know Nuno Alves personally, and neither has "attacked" anyone -- the "source" is in fact, a disgruntled ex-employee of UFO magazine deemed mentally unstable, who did indeed attack the biographee as an act of revenge, which resulted in the biographee filing a police report against the "source".

Please be aware of a possible "edit warring situation". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 179.209.198.85 (talk) 17:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic