Talk:Ad fructus uberes

Latest comment: 9 months ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Created by Kingoflettuce (talk). Self-nominated at 03:28, 18 January 2024 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ad fructus uberes; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited:  
  • Interesting:  
QPQ: Done.
Overall:   I'm AGFing on many of the offline sources, since I can't get access to most of them. However, I can get access to the hook source through JSTOR, and I can confirm that it does verify the hook. This is long enough, and I think it's more substantial than a stub (i.e. an article deemed too short and incomplete to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject), even if it is written as one section with a references list. Looks good to me. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:14, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply