Talk:Act III: M.O.T.T.E World Tour

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Alexataylor07 in topic TOTAL AUDIENCE

TOTAL AUDIENCE edit

i will update total audiences with these two sources 1 - 2

= 650,000 is likely to be less than the real amount of audiences

--EXTENDED 01:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Sigh...Not everything you see on the internet is true. Let's repeat it together: not everything you see on the internet is true. Picking reliable sources takes a little logic and discretion on the editor's behalf to ensure the information is reliable. Now, there are 16 shows with attendance that has not been reported so far. Let's minus 444,700 (confirmed numbers) from 650,000 which equals 205,300. Divide 205,300 into 16 equals 12,831. Thus, for the remaining dates he must have averaged 12,831 people per night for those unknown dates to make the number reliable. Yet, judging from already known sales in North America and Australia: [1][2][3], it is quite unlikely that he did. Also this "650,000" figure has circulated the web since the middle of the tour, meaning its not a completely accurate figure anyways. Also it's not uncommon in the case of unreported attendance to leave the total as partial and incomplete, to preserve the reliability of the information. Alexataylor07 (talk) 20:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Listen Please its already reported 654K Here: NYLON MAGAZINE This an Reliable Source, they have connections to know the actual data of attendance/gross etc... + Buy Pollstar account to know how exactly the numbers of the attendance , and i'm pretty sure its more than 654,000. okey now ?

--MRAU-VIP EXTENDED 00:37, 15 November 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by MRAU-vip (talkcontribs)

Concert attendance numbers must ALWAYS be retrieved from a reliable source (ie. Pollstar, Billboard, etc), if not then from reliable news outlets. However, I'm talking about individual concert numbers here. The total attendance of the tour should not come from a source that reportedly says ___ number of people attended it, rather it is the sum of all individual concert attendance numbers. If you are so sure that the total must be ~650,000, well surely you must be able to tell me how many people attended the European leg, or even just the London show for that matter. If you can't, what makes you so sure the number is reliable? Because multiple sources copied the same unreliable information? Not good enough. My point is, it goes against the norm on Wikipedia to include "predicted" or "estimates" of tour attendance, those numbers that are unknown are left as is and not included in the total, see: I Am... World Tour, The Endless Summer Tour, Maroon V Tour. Please stop making the article unreliable, it does nothing good for G-Dragon, and only serves to degrade the quality of this article. Alexataylor07 (talk) 09:10, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply