edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abstract Head. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:00, 3 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Shouldn't this article be about the "Abstract Head" series?

edit

Since the paintings in this large series are so similar to each other, wouldn't it make more sense for this article to be about the series, rather than about this individual painting which doesn't really distinguish itself from others? Most of the information I could find refers to the series as a whole, rather than individual artworks, so this article could probably be improved by widening its scope. We probably wouldn't even need to change its title. Insolent1 (talk) 14:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply