Talk:Aberavon RFC
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Importance
editI would class the Welsh national team as Top importance, the big four, Cardiff, Newport, Seansea and Lanelli as high importance, along with the their modern regional sides. If another Welsh team can break into the high category, it would probably be London Welsh/Neath. Aberavon just hasn't produced enough intertnationals. FruitMonkey (talk) 21:38, 10 February 2009 (UTC)
- importance=low for Rugby union; has not played at the top level (Pro12) in past 5 years Hamish59 (talk) 14:10, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
- Doesn't matter about pro-rugby, thats just recentism, this is an encyclopedia and Aberavon are of historical importance. Revert. FruitMonkey (talk) 16:41, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aberavon RFC. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131207041734/http://www.rugbyarchive.net/pagine/PaginaCompetizioni.aspx?ID=73 to http://www.rugbyarchive.net/Pagine/PaginaCompetizioni.aspx?ID=73
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:00, 25 June 2017 (UTC)