Talk:Abdul Rahim Dard
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Dthomsen8, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on September 2015. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: awaiting deletion decision |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 26 September 2015. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Not 'Woking' but Fazl Mosque edit
Hi, A. R. Dard NEVER was at Woking. He remained a missionary of the Ahmadiyya Jamaat, in London for 10 years. Two periods, only at Fazl Mosque London. --ڈاکٹر محمد علی (talk) 04:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
Comments moved to discuss here edit
- There are several issues of notability and reliable sources, some comments from others talk page to here for further discussion. As;
1: Stanley Wolpert who has done considerable research on Jinnah and his life writes (in "Jinnah of Pakistan") that it was Mr and Mrs. Liaquat Ali Khan who met Jinnah in summer of 1933 (that is I suppose June-Aug) and convinced him to return. -- SMS Talk 14:53, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
2: Brought here by a deletion discussion, @Smsarmad:, I was just reading "Jinnah in Pakistan", the only conclusion one can draw from this is that Liaquat Ali attempted to influence Jinnah to return to Pakistan. It says that "Liaquat's imprecations, offers of asistance; and flattery were, of course, an added factor, [to influence his return to India." This is not the same as "convincing" someone, as opposed to a number of refs that have just been removed, which do show that he was "convinced".--Peaceworld 16:29, 30 September 2015 (UTC)],
3: @User:Peaceworld111, besides the notability issue which Justice007 brought up, the other main problem is with regards to WP:Identifying_reliable_sources#Quotations "Any analysis or interpretation of the quoted material, however, should rely on a secondary source (See: WP:No original research).") So far the only commentary which was provided was sourced from a nephew of Dard in a newspaper, who was eager to give all the credit for the creation of Pakistan to his uncle. This was problematic, with regards to the weight that was being given to Dard in this featured article. If you have a scholarly source which provides commentary on Dard having notably influenced Jinnah, please provide it. Thanks. cӨde1+6 LogicBomb! 19:06, 30 September 2015 (UTC),
4: Exact, I am asking all the time to provide such sources to support content and notability of the subject. I suggest that issues should be discussed on the article talk page.Justice007 (talk) 20:20, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
I hope this helps.Justice007 (talk) 07:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)