Talk:A Great Big Pile of Leaves

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Notability?

edit

This band may have some notability, some quick links: Alt Press Absolute Punk Review -- MacAddct1984 (talk • contribs) 23:12, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <replace these words with your reason>. — 68.196.41.202 (talk) 23:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the band represent a contribution to the burgeoning Seattle-inspired guitar band scene — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.220.253 (talk) 23:31, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the band posted a link to this page on facebook proud of the fact that someone put the article up. Taking away the achievement would be very disheartening for them. — 99.57.121.132 (talk) 23:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this article is highly significant to A Great Big Pile of Leaves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.151.16.174 (talk) 23:36, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I listen to this band and love their music. They are a music of this generation that is unnoticed and deserves to be listened to. — 149.68.243.64 (talk) 23:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because they are signed to a record label and have a very large and loyal following. — 67.149.80.122 (talk) 23:38, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because all rock music is equally invalid historically, and therefore this band is no less invalid than any other rock musicians who have wikipedia pages. — 98.110.22.105 (talk) 23:41, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <replace these words with your reason>. — 76.190.130.176 (talk) 23:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is a band that is very good

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this band's material has had quite a profound affect on my life. I think that their music is incredibly well written, highly influential and original, and they showcase strong talent in production, composition, and skilled playing of their instruments.

On a more personal note, this band's music has always made me feel better about life overall. I can't even express the joy the music they write gives me.

Now, give me reasons why this article simply must be deleted. It can't be too big of a file. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.5.156.37 (talk) 23:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it just went up and will fill with information soon! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.88.34.113 (talk) 00:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this page will get better. — ShelbyAreI (talk) 00:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because they are slowly rising in popularity in the indie genre especially among teens. — 69.255.170.160 (talk) 01:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because A Great Big Pile of Leaves is a relevant and quickly growing band. — 72.19.66.24 (talk) 01:32, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <they are a professional recording band with an established fan base>. — 68.116.207.85 (talk) 01:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because A Great Big Pile of leaves is a notable band who toured with Say Anything in fall 2010. — 71.68.22.4 (talk) 02:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it is legitmate. — 99.56.212.64 (talk) 02:54, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because <replace these words with your reason>. — 24.99.154.83 (talk) 08:13, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

DELETE this bandspam! no notability, refs

edit

the ref list is a facade. TWITTER, YOUTUBE, and YOUR OWN WEBSITE are not wp reliable sources. enough already with the ip sockpuppet talk comments Cramyourspam (talk) 19:57, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on A Great Big Pile of Leaves. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 24 June 2017 (UTC)Reply