Talk:A Course of Modern Analysis
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Mjt1949 in topic Fifth edition
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A Course of Modern Analysis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Untitled edit
"Abramowitz and Stegun is a modern successor" is tremendously innacurate. How does this type of post survive? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.157.15.15 (talk • contribs) 2006-02-27T18:57:19
- Would you like to explain that? We are talking about authoritative texts on special functions. If you want to make the point that A&S is not a comparable text on the side of analysis, yes, that can be mentioned. Charles Matthews 14:04, 28 February 2006 (UTC)
Fifth edition edit
The fifth edition was published by Cambridge University Press in 2021. It has been revised and digitally reset. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mjt1949 (talk • contribs) 17:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)