Talk:ANT+

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Mountainlogic in topic Is ANT+ is really ANT-?

Open?

edit

ANT is a proprietary and closed system and the link in the beginning is not correct. There is nothing open about ANT —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.50.173.230 (talk) 14:24, 19 July 2010

That would be "open" as in open systems (which is already linked to in the article), not open source or to some extinct open standards. --Heb (talk)
Well, Definition of open systems is that they shall rely on Open Standards (if relevant). ANT standards are only available to Alliance members and thus NOT open. 92.204.100.174 (talk) 12:06, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

What does "ANT" stand for?

edit

Is the "ANT" here an acronym for something (usual when something is capitalised)? I know the company itself is called ANT as well. Perhaps needs an explanation in there somewhere. Jimthing (talk) 17:34, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Is ANT+ is really ANT-?

edit

The opening says this:"ANT+[1] (pronounced ant plus) is a sub-system"

I'm unsure of what sub-system means in this context, but it suggests sub-set. Is a device that is ANT-compatible also ANT+ compatible? And might a device that is ANT+ compatible be incompatible with some ANT devices? Captain Puget (talk) 17:55, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

To answer my own question, the ANT (no plus) article says "ANT+ is an interoperability function that can be added to the base ANT protocol."

This (ANT+) article appears to be redundant and perhaps misleading. Captain Puget (talk) 18:01, 7 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article could really use to distinguish the difference between ant and +. From the article I assume that + is the standardization of data fields for specific profiles, but who knows??? Mountainlogic (talk) 20:42, 9 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on ANT+. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply