Talk:AK-102

Latest comment: 1 year ago by FeralOink in topic Removed more sources needed tag

Page title edit

The page has the title "AK-102 assault rifle", all other AK rifles are just named "AK-101", "AK-103" etc. Which option is standard? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.234.244 (talk) 22:13, 1 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, IP editor of 2012. The page name has since been corrected to AK-102. It is NOT AK-102 assault rifle; you were correct!--FeralOink (talk) 16:25, 20 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AK-102. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:36, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Removed more sources needed tag edit

I updated the article today, and added four sources, as well as an External Links section with a fifth source. I decided that that there is now a sufficient number of citations, and removed the "more sources needed" tag. If other editors feel that the tag should be restored, let's discuss it here.-- FeralOink (talk) 06:00, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply