Talk:ABS Aerolight

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ABS Aerolight article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

OR

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

"The company appears to have gone out of business in late 2007 and production ended."

This is definitely original research. It would not pass if brought to WP:RSN. The problem is domain name /web page expiration may linger for a year or more since these things are typically pre-paid. It's possible a company merged, or changed names. Or they are no longer be visible online but still exist.

I would suggest, rather than asserting a fact we don't know, state what we know: "The company website ceased functioning as of XYZ date" and leave it to the reader to decide. Also, the archive.org citation needs more explanation as it's not clear what is being linked and why. Recommend "The company website apparently ceased to function sometime between September 4, 2007 and February 14, 2008 according to Wayback Machine archives." as part of the ref so its clear to the reader why the Wayback Machine link is being used as a ref and a date range. -- GreenC 14:26, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for bringing this up. The company's old website www.absaerolight.com currently is being used by some unrelated Chinese company, which is common practice. These companies often buy up defunct domains and cybersquat on them, hoping that people looking for the old, defunct company will find their products instead. In May 2015 the website domain actually had a "for sale" sign on it. If the company had been merged, bought out or otherwise still existed in most cases the old domain would redirect to the new website domain name, so as not to lose customers. These are just common business practices these days, although there is no proof that this is what happened in this specific case. When I wrote this I did do a careful search to see if the company was being perpetuated anywhere or in any way, but drew a blank, just as any past customers looking for the company would most likely do. It seems reasonable to conclude the the company just shut down and that some time after that their website went offline, which we know happened "sometime between September 4, 2007 and February 14, 2008", as you noted. My conclusion from all the available information is reflected as "The company appears to have gone out of business in late 2007". This is the best information we have, which is why it is worded in a tentative manner, and footnoted it to let readers know where this came from. This is an attempt to provide the best information possible for readers, although if we want to go with what we know 100%, all we can say is that by Feb 2008 the website was offline and the company could not be located. - Ahunt (talk) 18:47, 4 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ABS Aerolight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150520033049/http://www.absaerolight.com/ to http://www.absaerolight.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:44, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic