Talk:A- and B-class destroyer
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic Merger proposal
 | The contents of the B-class destroyer page were merged into A- and B-class destroyer. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A- and B-class destroyer article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
Merger proposal edit
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to merge the articles. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:51, 25 September 2015 (UTC)
I believe that the B-class destroyer article be merged into this one as the B-class ships were essentially repeats of the A class. This will match how our other existing class articles are organized for the British interwar intermediate destroyers (G and H-class destroyer, E and F-class destroyer, etc.) and follow how some sources, like Conway's All the World's Fighting Ships 1922–46, organize their coverage.Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 21:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support merge. If the classes were similar in everything but name, then they should be one page.Llammakey (talk) 22:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support merge - there is very little difference between the classes as built - basically boiling down to the B-class being fitted with Sonar and better depth charge armament and A-class having minesweeping equipment, with the A-class having a larger flotilla leader. The two classes were effectively variants of the same design, and the differences between them disappeared by World War II anyway.Nigel Ish (talk) 14:34, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
- Support merge: There has been no opposition in 8 days and consensus for merge. If the two articles can be merged with a result like the "E and F-class destroyer" article I would say this would be a major improvement. Otr500 (talk) 09:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.