This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||
|
See also section
editI removed the See also section from this article per WP:SEEALSO, which says in part:
- As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body
My edit was reverted by User:Schoolskater, and I do not wish to start an edit war. I hope you will reconsider whether the See also section adds any value to this article. Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 14:17, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Oh, Thanks for clarifying that for me User:GoingBatty. I totally understand now. I guess I was just getting a little annoyed because I had worked on this article to make it better, cause I found it on the community portal page saying it needed wikilinks. Thanks for clarifying!Schoolskater (talk) 14:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- @Schoolskater: It's great that wikilinks were added in the article's body, which should be sufficient. Will you be removing the See also section?
- I see that one of the links is to NASA - the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Should the link go to National Auto Sport Association instead? Thanks! GoingBatty (talk) 14:55, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
Its all fixed.Schoolskater (talk) 15:05, 10 June 2014 (UTC)