Untitled

edit

I am deleting the recommendation for deletion because I have thoroughly cleaned and revised the article, sourcing new references, neutral reliable sources, and notable collaborations. I shall continue to source notable material and information. Ben.lahring (talk) 17:19, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Moving Page (Changing Title)

edit

I have corrected the capitalization from 50 records to 50 Records, thus changing the title of the article. I believe all links to this page should work, and there are only a few double-redirects. Ben.lahring (talk) 14:16, 21 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Neutrality

edit

Cwilli201, you have disputed the neutrality of this page without giving reason or example. Sufficient third-party, neutral sources have been cited, and facts gleaned from official 50 Records pages have been done so in regards to history and company operations that cannot be found elsewhere. Having been a twin-city resident, surely you know the validity of sources such as Twin Cities Business Magazine. There is no advertising present in this article, as all events referred to are in the past, with the exception of the Elevation album release, to which no further details beyond month and year were given, including the title of the album. Independent record labels are an essential part of the Twin Cities culture, and just as Rhymesayers represent twin-cities hip-hop and Red House Records represent twin-cities folk, so 50 Records represents twin-cities indie-rock and also deserve a fair and accurate wikipedia article. If you, or anyone, truly dispute the neutrality of this article, then as fellow wikipedia contributors, do some research and edit the 50 Records article into what you believe to be neutral. Ben.lahring (talk) 14:29, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Removing Neutrality Dispute

edit

It's been a long time now with no response or further dispute/discussion, so I'm removing the dispute tag from this page. Ben.lahring (talk) 17:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

File:Zude50records.png listed for deletion

edit

File:Zude50records.png being used in this article is being considered for deletion in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policy. Please share your thoughts on the matter at this file's entry on the Files for deletion page. All interested editors are welcome to comment. Thanks in advance. - Marchjuly (talk) 01:21, 10 July 2015 (UTC)Reply