Talk:505 Dundas

Canada: Ontario / Toronto Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Toronto (assessed as Mid-importance).

Trains: Streetcars Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:505 Dundas.

December 2010 derailment and "incidents" section

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please refer to Talk:Toronto_Transit_Commission#Incidents_section the discussion here when creating incidents sections. While the story was newsworthy for the day, it is unlikely that it will be relevant next week or next month.eja2k 17:06, 17 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Henry Dundas

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

User:Joeyconnick prefers wording saying that "Henry Dundas, 1st Viscount Melville, who delayed the abolition of the transatlantic slave trade" (implication: guilty) rather than that he was "blamed for delaying" its abolition (implication: allegation). The cited city document cited "Henry Dundas' role in delaying the abolition of the trans-Atlantic slave trade" and "Whatever the motivation behind his amendment may have been, the consequences of Dundas' actions are clear."

Dundas was an abolitionist who inserted the word "gradually" in an emancipation bill. See: Henry Dundas, 1st Viscount Melville#Academic dispute over Dundas's impact on abolition. A recent Star article said "Henry Dundas' legacy is disputed, but many experts agree he helped delay the abolition of the trans-Atlantic slave trade while an 18th Century British minister." A National Post article disputed blaming Dundas.

I feel that the existing wording is too strong, and should be more neutral. TheTrolleyPole (talk) 21:42, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

You've just cited 2 sources where they clearly state he delayed the abolition of the slave trade, including the city's own statement on the matter. I don't see what the issue is. —Joeyconnick (talk) 03:28, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic