Talk:38th Infantry Division (United States)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 38th Infantry Division (United States). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111112094030/http://www.ausa.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/ILW%20Web-ExclusivePubs/Torchbearer/TBearComp1v12.pdf to http://www.ausa.org/SiteCollectionDocuments/ILW%20Web-ExclusivePubs/Torchbearer/TBearComp1v12.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130208223022/http://www.campatterbury.in.ng.mil/AboutUs/CampAtterburyHistory/tabid/1591/Default.aspx to http://www.campatterbury.in.ng.mil/AboutUs/CampAtterburyHistory/tabid/1591/Default.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Al Anbar Province during Operation Iraqi Freedom

Please don't take this as a criticism of the company mentioned, but strictly from the perspective of a Wikipedia editor, it seems a little odd that out of an entire Division, only one company merits any specific mention in Operation Iraqi Freedom. Company A, 2nd Battalion (Mechanized), 152nd Infantry Regiment gets an entire section, and it's almost as much print in this article as all of WWI. The two topics shouldn't carry the same weight, in my opinion. It seems like there are a few ways to correct this. 1) Reduce the detail given to Company A, 2-152, and integrate it into the rest of the Post 9/11 text, 2) give Company A, 2-152 it's own Wikipedia article and link to it, and/or 3) fill up the rest of the article so the Division history is emphasized over individual companies within the Division (i.e. more on WWI and WWII, etc.) Just an outside observation. Canute (talk) 16:44, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Maybe move the detailed info here? 152nd Infantry Regiment (United States)