Talk:318th Operations Support Squadron

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Lineagegeek in topic External links modified

Monstrosity edit

Where to start? This page was merged without discussion or notice (the merged from template was placed on 14 November 2014). There is not justification for the merger. I have also reassessed the article to reflect that neither coverage, accuracy, not supporting materials meet Wiki standard. The only references cited are dead links, and one, a public relations release, in this case is not a reliable source.

In short, there is no relationship between the 23d Information Operations Squadron and the 318th Operations Support Squadron except for the fact that in 2011 the 318th replaced the 23d. The 23d has a long history as a photographic reconnaissance and intelligence unit. The 318th was an airdrome squadron at Columbia Army Air Base for one year in World War II before being disbanded. It was reconstituted and activated in 2011 as an operations support squadron. Remove the 23d history and this unit does not meet Wikipedia notability standards. --Lineagegeek (talk) 21:51, 12 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 318th Operations Support Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool. --Lineagegeek (talk) 17:46, 24 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:34, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply