Talk:2929 Entertainment
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Why 2929?
editDoes anyone know the origin of the company name? I find no reference to it on the company's website. Does it have anything to do with simulaneous release to DVD and theater - both released on 29th? --Georgeryp 06:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
2929 productions IS NOT a vertically integrated company. Besides the fact that Vertical Integration is illegal; in order for a company to be a Vertical Integrated company it must own, not only the production company, and the distribution company, it must also own theaters. 2929 Productions does not own any theaters, therefore, 2929 Productions IS NOT a vertically integrated company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhalek (talk • contribs) 22:53, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
- I don't think anyone's tried to insist that 2929 Productions is a vertically integrated company. 76.235.248.47 (talk) 21:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
- Even though, technically, 2929 IS a vertically-integrated company (it owns film production companies - HDNet Films & 2929 productions, a film distributor - Magnolia Pictures, AND movie theatres - Landmark Theatres); not to mention, according to the law, 2929 being vertically-integrated isn't a problem as long as they don't use that status to prioritize themselves over other film studios, whether with Magnolia OR Landmark. So, as it turns out, not only is Jhalek wrong about 2929 being a vertically-integrated company, they're also unaware that it's not a problem as long as 2929 doesn't use its status to put themselves first before other film studios. 2602:304:CEBF:8650:34B6:3C6B:4652:713C (talk) 00:59, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
The origin of the name 2929
editWhen Mark Cuban started AudioNet he used a location in Deep Ellum at 2929 Elm St.to net cast from. The space is still owned by Cuban / HD-Net and is sometimes used for video shoots. Fr33ze (talk) 22:08, 9 May 2010 (UTC)