Talk:2024 Balochistan bombings
Latest comment: 2 months ago by AllTheUsernamesAreInUse in topic Merger of 2024 Balochistan twin blasts to this article
 | A news item involving 2024 Balochistan bombings was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 11 February 2024. |  |
| While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the 2024 Balochistan twin blasts page were merged into 2024 Balochistan bombings on 23 February 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Merger of 2024 Balochistan twin blasts to this article edit
- Support - The article, 2024 Balochistan twin blasts, which is a stub, should be merged into this article, 2024 Balochistan bombings. The articles are clearly duplicates about the same bombing. But this article is more developed. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 10:09, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Adding to the support train. CyrusGD (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Cameron Dewe Support - The same Reason as you mentioned M.Nauman123 (talk) 21:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support - for the reasons you listed LuxembourgBoy42 (talk) 00:35, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Same reasons as above. Borgenland (talk) 10:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support These are duplicate articles. Blaylockjam10 (talk) 05:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support As per above, the article to be merged contains no unique information from this article. 2G0o2De0l (talk) 13:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. Setarip (talk) 12:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
- •Support per nom Codenamewolf (talk) 08:15, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per above. S5A-0043Talk 14:56, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support - clear consensus. Clear decision. BabbaQ (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support speedy merge per WP:A10. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 21:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- This discussion really should be closed already, if not for WP:A10, then at least per WP:SNOW. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:20, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nominator 83.168.137.1 (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
- Done, because apparently no one else felt like it. PARAKANYAA (talk) 14:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
- Oops, I didn't know anyone could do it, otherwise I'd have done it myself. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 04:48, 26 February 2024 (UTC)