This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
The article makes the personal opinion and calculations on a blog by a certain Tom Lynch as a fact that the photo finish was set up wrong. However it has never been conclusively proven that the setup was wrong and it has only lead to various speculation, but that speculation does not equates a proven fact. The article should thus be changed to "speculated" as opposed to the way it currently reads which is authorative. Which it is not. ALso the source in question (the website by Lynch) is not authorative like regular news media are. -- fdewaele, 31 July 2021, 19:55 CET.