Talk:2018 NCAA Division I Outdoor Track and Field Championships

Athletics High‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Script edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Here's the script I've been using to make these tables in case anyone wants to take over while I'm not around, or if it's useful in other articles: User:Habst/Scripts/makencaatable.py --Habst (talk) 04:47, 7 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Women's 100-meter hurdles edit

Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I noticed the link [35] to the 'results' is actually a link for the 2016 results hence the original wind reading listed of +3.8m/s was incorrect (& I amended it). You may like to remove that link (I don't know how). Thanks 120.16.33.134 (talk) 02:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I fixed the link. --Habst (talk) 00:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic