Talk:2016 E3 Harelbeke

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2016 E3 Harelbeke/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 07:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

I will review this. Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:48, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Some things left to do here:

• At the end of the first paragraph, you need to make it clearer that Kwiatkowski is comparing himself a year before with Sagan when saying that it is "very difficult" with the pressure of the rainbow jersey.
• You also need to make the expression "without legs" clearer. Maybe don't use the quote at all and rather paraphrase it.
• Also, you use the word "said" too often in that section. Try to find some synonyms to make it a more enjoyable read.
• The article could also use another photo, maybe one in the favorites section, or one of the eventual winner in the race summary or post-race section.

Sorry this took so long. I should be through all four reviews by tomorrow. On hold for now. Good job so far! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Since the nominator does not appear to be coming back, I have made the changes myself. Passed for GA. Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:50, 2 June 2016 (UTC)