Wikipedia

Talk:2015 Texas–Oklahoma flood and tornado outbreak

Latest comment: 2 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
Learn more about this page

Title

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion

@Cyclonebiskit: Congratulations on the new article; I myself have been impacted by much of this event. In any case, is it part of some standard or something that you put Texas before Oklahoma in the title? I would've done it the other way around myself (alphabetically, you see), but if you think this is a better title for some reason, I'll respect your decision. Dustin (talk) 04:20, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Also, Oklahoma City's monthly record for rainfall which was originally held, if I recall correctly, by June 1989 has been shattered, so May 2015 is the wettest month on record by a significant margin. This isn't as relevant to the short-term flooding, though. Dustin (talk) 04:25, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Texas has been hardest hit by the floods so far, it seems, so I put it first for emphasis. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 04:31, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Seems a bit early to speculate on the long-term historical impact and therefore appropriate name of the event. Right now I suspect it's a transient that will soon be forgotten... I remember being caught in a major flood in mid-June of 1976 in Houston, but I was also living in Austin during the flood in 1981, and my friends are reminiscing about the event I have no memory of... Shanen (talk) 08:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

"Tornado outbreak" in title

edit

A new issue has appeared. For a few reasons, I have to question the inclusion of "tornado outbreak" in the title; most tornado outbreaks have a date range in the title, but that doesn't appear to be a good choice in this situation. Earlier in May, there was also (less significant) flooding and a tornado outbreak. Could this be a cause for confusion? Dustin (talk) 02:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Maps

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

http://water.weather.gov/ahps/

http://i.imwx.com/images/maps/special/severe_us_600x405.jpg

http://i.imwx.com/images/maps/forecast/precfcst_600x405.jpg

2001:558:1418:31:1478:A7B3:2ADD:1D24 (talk) 14:54, 26 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

None of these links is really helpful, a link to a graph during the height of the storms for instance, from NOAA or NASA maybe ('cause public domain material), could be considered. Or images from affected areas with telling content, from flickr, released under CC-BY-2.0, unfortunately there is not a single one, as of now. prokaryotes (talk) 03:04, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

An updated map was uploaded to Wikipedia Commons showing the 70 Texas counties included in the state of disaster declaration as of May 29, 2015: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2015-05-29_Texas-Emergency_70-County_2400x2400.png. Profitic (talk) 15:55, 3 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Wow

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago9 comments6 people in discussion

This page really outlines the floods in Oklahoma. That four sentence paragraph really touches upon the thousands of people who lost everything and the billions of dollars in damage that occurred all over the state of Oklahoma. No need for a map of Oklahoma showing the counties that were under a state of emergency when the Governor issues one for the entire state. No need to post any pictures of the floods in the state of Oklahoma... Or the multiple tornadoes that destroyed homes in Moore and leveled the entire town of Bridge Creek, No need to talk about the record setting rainfall that occurred in the state of Oklahoma. You really knocked it out of the park with this one. I think you should add a few more sections talking about how Texans are a resilient people and deserve to be honored for living in the most important state affected by the recent May floods. You did a great job not mentioning Oklahoma anywhere else in the article but making sure to add Missouri, Kansas and Louisiana in your graphs. We just feel honored that you mentioned us in the title and allowed our state name to appear alongside yours during this very unfortunate Texas tragedy. Nice Work. Kryan74 (talk) 02:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your high praise. We try our hardest to make Wiki as comprehensive as possible and were uncertain as to whether or not the material present for Oklahoma was enough. But your support of our work has shown that we've done an excellent job thus far. Thank you again for your input. Cyclonebiskit (talk) 02:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Your sarcasm is neither needed nor wanted. This event is ongoing, and trying to keep up with constantly changing figures is tough. In addition, the editors adding information to this page have real-life responsibilities--I'm sure some people don't have the time to sit down all day and edit. But by all means, if you have the time and energy and know how to improve this article, go ahead and do it. I'm sure that would be much more appreciated than snide comments on a talk page. Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia after all. ;) TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 02:56, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
It's not so much that Oklahoma is being ignored as Texas getting more attention from what are already few total editors. The issue isn't that Texas is getting too much information, but that Oklahoma needs to be expanded upon. Some editors may be more interested in the Texas side of things, and other editors (such as you or me) may be more interested in the Oklahoma side of things. That doesn't mean we shouldn't help each other out and try to make sure that everything gets a decent amount of coverage in the encyclopedia. A lot of it depends on what's in the news (people are more likely to look up things in the news, for example) and where more people live. Its unfortunate that some sides of things are unfairly overlooked or given less attention, but that's just the way things go. If you think this is a problem, help to counter the problem and add more information! Any good contribution is appreciated! :) Dustin (talk) 02:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Also, Bridge Creek was not destroyed, although there was damage there not too long ago. Dustin (talk) 19:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Look. It's pretty clear you have an "everything is bigger in Texas" mentality. How about just doing an article on the Texas flooding and let someone else do one on Oklahoma. This article is an joke and a slap in the face to the thousands of Oklahomans that have been dealing with this weeks before it reached the great state of Texas. I would suggest changing the title to more accurately reflect the article you have written, because this page has nothing to do with Oklahoma. Kryan74 (talk) 03:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

If you got a news article outlining a situation similar as described in this article, from another state (or something from OK), post it below, and we can see to extent this article. prokaryotes (talk) 03:07, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

if you are going to title the article "Texas and Oklahoma Flooding," Then be prepared to write and article on Texas AND Oklahoma flooding. The responsibility falls on you to research that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kryan74 (talk • contribs) 03:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Most weather editors on Wikipedia are from the East Coast and have little to no interest in pitting one drive-through state against another. There's really no grand conspiracy at play here, as disappointing as that may be. Invariably, current-event articles remain woefully underdeveloped until after the dust settles. In the time you've spent reprimanding us you could have easily started the ball rolling on more complete Oklahoma information, and seeing as you've been editing for nearly a decade, you're just as much responsible for this article as any other volunteer. Would you care to do something useful? – Juliancolton | Talk 04:06, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Move to "May 2015 North American storm complex"?

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago10 comments3 people in discussion
  Stale
 – The title of this article is very important and the fact that there is information on the Mexico tornado within the body but that Mexico is not addressed in any way in the title is very misleading. The title doesn't have to be the suggestion I made above, however we should figure something out which addresses the three affected areas; Texas, Oklahoma and Mexico, and the tornado outbreak and floods within these corresponding areas. If this cannot be done then part of the article needs to be split off. Undescribed (talk) 00:12, 30 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Since this article includes both the tornado outbreak in Mexico and the U.S. as well as the flooding, and that it was all the result of one large storm system, it seems to make the most sense to change it to this title. I just don't see any other way to incorporate the tornado outbreak and flooding into the title in a way that includes both Mexico and the US. A title such as 2015 United States-Mexico flood and tornado outbreak or 2015 North American flood and tornado outbreak just seems too vague and complicated. Pages with a similar format include October 2010 North American storm complex and January 2008 North American storm complex. Thoughts? --Undescribed (talk) 03:21, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your suggestion is reasonable, but not to be rude, problematic, or anything, but I tried to bring this up the title issue in an earlier section, but I guess nobody saw it. Dustin (talk) 03:27, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
It makes sense to me that the page title needs to be specified more. I definitely agree with the point that you made. I think that both the flooding and tornadoes are significant enough to warrant the move. As for the events earlier this month, the flooding; although apparent, was not nearly as significant as this event, so the title was able to focus on the tornado outbreak. However in this event both the flooding and outbreak seem to be almost equally significant. --Undescribed (talk) 03:32, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
My only objection to the move would be the fact that the page only seems to include one tornado in Mexico, which happened to have resulted in all of the deaths in that country. Although both the flooding/tornado outbreak in the US and tornado(s) in Mexico were caused by the same storm system, it might be better to move the Mexico tornado to it's own page since it was the only significant event caused by the storm in that country, and was not a "tornado outbreak." Undescribed (talk) 03:40, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
I think the words Flood and 2015 should be part of the name, and i think that "complex" sounds odd. But personally i think it should be something with this scope, like "2015 May extreme weather USA" prokaryotes (talk) 07:40, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Then what if we split the article to two different pages titled May 2015 Texas-Oklahoma floods and May 23-25, 2015 tornado outbreak? An analog for a U.S-Mexico tornado event was the April 20–26, 2007 tornado outbreak sequence. --Undescribed (talk) 11:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
I would leave it at May 2015 Texas-Oklahoma floods (including the tornadoes connected with the event), and then add one extra article on the US 2015 tornado season.(Maybe there is one already?) prokaryotes (talk) 11:45, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
The U.S. tornado season is largely covered by Tornadoes of 2015 because the very large majority of tornadoes in the world occur in the United States. Dustin (talk) 17:41, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply
Perhaps we could add a separate article on the tornado in Mexico? If Mexico is staying out of the title then it would not make sense to have it in the article if the title only mentions Texas and Oklahoma. --Undescribed (talk) 19:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

material for expansion on the effects in Mexico

edit
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
material from the Spanish article for expansion
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

El tornado de Ciudad Acuña de 2015 se registró durante las primeras horas de la mañana del lunes 25 de mayo de 2015 en Ciudad Acuña; en el extremo norte del estado mexicano de Coahuila.

De acuerdo a la Comisión Nacional del Agua, el fenómeno ocurrió entre las 5:30 y las 06:00 horas, tiempo del Centro, alcanzando la categoría 4 en la Escala Fujita mejorada.[1] Sin embargo, poco después el coordinador de Protección Civil, Luis Felipe Puente Salas, ajustó la intensidad a quedar en categoría 3.[2]

El mismo día 25, la Secretaría de Gobernación informó de forma oficial que el tornado dejaba un saldo preliminar de 13 personas fallecidas y 229 lesionados; así como cerca de 1000 viviendas con daños, muchos de ellos totales.[3] El saldo de fallecidos se elevó a 14 personas el 27 de mayo, al perder la vida uno de los heridos hospitalizados.[4]

See http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tornado_de_Ciudad_Acu%C3%B1a_de_2015 μηδείς (talk) 23:55, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ "Tornado azota Ciudad Acuña, Coahuila". Milenio. 25 de mayo de 2015. Retrieved 25 de mayo de 2015. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  2. ^ López Segura, Eduardo (25 de mayo de 2015). "Fue categoría F3 el tornado de Ciudad Acuña". Noticieros Televisa. Retrieved 25 de mayo de 2015. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  3. ^ Morales, Alberto (25 de mayo de 2015). "Suman 13 muertos por tornado en Cd. Acuña: Segob". El Universal. Retrieved 25 de mayo de 2015. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
  4. ^ Fernández, Hilda (27 de mayo de 2015). "Suman 14 muertos por tornado en Ciudad Acuña". El Universal. Retrieved 27 de mayo de 2015. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= and |date= (help)
edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on 2015 Texas–Oklahoma flood and tornado outbreak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Tornado outbreak sequence of May 5–10, 2015 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:05, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2015_Texas–Oklahoma_flood_and_tornado_outbreak&oldid=1196694183"