Talk:2015 British Grand Prix

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified
Good article2015 British Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2015 British Grand Prix is part of the 2015 Formula One season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 10, 2015Good article nomineeListed
September 18, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Undercut

edit

@Twirlypen: I saw you re-phrased the race part a bit and added the word "undercut". I refrained from using the term so far, because I have yet failed to find a good source describing what it is. While it is a regular term in F1 for the last two years, we should not use it here unless we can explain what it is to reader not so familiar with F1. Maybe you can find a good source? Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Forget it, found one :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Zwerg Nase, that wasn't me. I'm not fussy on wording. I'll fix grammatical and spelling errors and such, but a complete rewrite isn't my MO. Honestly, your version was better. Whoever did rewrite it made it sound like a news article, which is a big no-no. Twirlypen (talk) 10:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
Twirlypen, Oh, then I saw that wrong. Thank you for the clarification! I'll go over the prose again before nominating it for GA. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2015 British Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply